Financial Census 2026

Financial Census 2026

Late payments are still draining finance teams.

85% of finance teams have automated AP, yet 96% say late payments cause stress and burnout.

AP automation was supposed to make supplier payments faster, easier, and more predictable.

But the Medius Financial Census 2026 reveals a different reality. Most finance teams say they have automated accounts payable and are satisfied with their technology. At the same time, invoices are still being paid late, suppliers are changing how they work with customers, and AP teams are spending too much time chasing approvals and resolving disputes.

illustration of a woman working at a computer

Late Payments: Automation's
Broken Promise

85% of finance teams have automated AP. So why are a third of invoices still going out late? Our 2026 Financial Census uncovers the gap between what organizations believe their AP tech is doing—and what's happening on the ground.

The AP perception gap.

Finance leaders generally believe their payment processes are working:

graphical representation of survey data

90%

are satisfied with their current AP technology.


95%

are satisfied with how long it takes to pay suppliers.


85%

report using some level of AP automation.


Yet 45% say that 21-40% of their invoices are paid late in a typical month.

That disconnect is the AP perception gap: organizations believe their automation is delivering, while their payment results, suppliers, and AP teams tell a different story.

Automation has not eliminated manual work.

The Census found that 46% of organizations describe their AP process as fully automated from end to end. Another 39% say they are partially automated but still rely on some manual steps.

Only 14% report having no automation at all.

The question is no longer whether finance teams have invested in AP technology. It’s whether that technology has removed enough friction to keep invoices moving without constant intervention.

When approvals still depend on email reminders, invoice data has to be corrected by hand, or teams need to switch between disconnected systems. Automation can move the bottleneck instead of removing it.

illustration of a stack of invoices

Why are invoices still being paid late?

Finance professionals say the leading causes of late payments are operational, not technological.

Causes of late payments:

23%

Internal approval bottlenecks

21%

Insufficient cash flow management

21%

Disputed invoices or data mismatches

18%

Under-resourced AP teams

16%

Poor visibility on upcoming deadlines

Approval delays are the most common problem. But they are part of a wider process issue involving unreliable data, limited visibility, competing priorities, and too much work falling back on the AP team.

Automation cannot deliver on-time payments when the processes underneath are fragmented.

Late payments burn out AP teams.

Managing late payments is no small administrative inconvenience.

96% of finance professionals say late payments have contributed to stress or burnout within the AP team. More than one in four describe the impact as significant or severe.

Every delayed invoice can generate more work—from chasing approvers to managing escalations.

illustration of man leaning back away from desk as if they're fatiqgued

Suppliers are responding.

Late payments not only affect the finance team, they change supplier behavior.

Finance professionals report that suppliers have responded to late payments by:

graphical representation of survey data

45%

are imposing stricter payment terms upfront.


43%

are ending client replationships.


42%

are reducing service quality or speed.


42%

are escalating to formal dispute or legal action.


Late payment performance can therefore affect more than fees and discounts. It can weaken supplier trust, reduce negotiating power, and put access to critical goods and services at risk.

The problem is often bigger than AP.

Finance teams know payment processes need to improve, but several barriers continue to get in the way:

Barriers to improving payment processes:

22%

Too many systems and too much complexity

21%

Other digital projects take priority

19%

Uncertainty about available solutions

19%

No allocated budget

17%

Lack of internal champions or executive support

The most common barrier is complexity. Adding another system to an already fragmented environment will not necessarily help.

The goal should be to connect invoice capture, processing, approvals, and payments in one clear process, with fewer handoffs and fewer places for work to stop.

See the causes of AP bottlenecks

Ready to transform your AP? 

Book a Demo Contact Us